You are correct. While vultures have a big edge for one hand at a time, they do not always win. And she said she ALWAYS wins
Why is Ultimate X so popular?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:07 am
-
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:06 am
I'll keep that in mind, I'm not though, I'm a couple hours north. Which means Toledo is even further unfortunately.Jstark wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 3:17 pmAssuming you're near the Detroit area based on previous post. Toledo has one 5☆ machine that has single hand UX on it.applepear86 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 3:25 amI like single hand UX sometimes, but nowhere in my state offers it. I wish they didn't program them to force you to play exactly 3, 5 or 10 hands. I loathe multihand UX
UX is a big drain in my unpopular opinion. It will suck money out of you to compensate for extremely rare events, while at the same time collecting it's 2% or more mathematical advantage. That royal that you're hoping will hand after a full house or flush, odds of that happening are about 1 in 2 million on a per hand basis. And you're still paying the house edge mathematically speaking all within those hands until you achieve these lightning strike events that are built into the game's math. Also, If your VP wins are spread out instead of back-to-back, you will be extinguished quickly!
That said, if you like UX, good for you, I hope your good results continue!![]()


-
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:16 pm
I guess we'd have to define "always." On a hand for hand basis, I agree. On a daily basis, it's difficult to have a losing day. Weekly, I'll go out on a limb and say it's quite impossible to lose strictly playing that way.
Anyway though, I doubt that person was a vulturer anyway.
-
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:16 pm
Although Toledo does have decent higher paying games, definitely not worth the while of an overnight trip.Jstark wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 10:17 amI guess we'd have to define "always." On a hand for hand basis, I agree. On a daily basis, it's difficult to have a losing day. Weekly, I'll go out on a limb and say it's quite impossible to lose strictly playing that way.
Anyway though, I doubt that person was a vulturer anyway.