Could've been the 10.
Sequential Royal
-
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2019 7:18 pm
Does the jackpot pay on reversible? Some are only 10-J-Q-K-A.
At least you got the push...
At least you got the push...
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8000
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
It should pay on the reverse and he got the smallest consolation available.TripleTriple wrote: ↑Sun Oct 31, 2021 7:52 amDoes the jackpot pay on reversible? Some are only 10-J-Q-K-A.
At least you got the push...
-
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:33 am
Yes, AKQJT would have been $213K. No swing. Thanks for the $5...(I think I actually booked a win that night, and next time I went it was gone)
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8563
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:58 am
I’ve never seen that JOB wrinkle. And such crazy money. Hey, five bucks is five bucks. You could have won zero.
-
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:33 am
They often put the reversible royals jackpot on a box with many games, JoB, Bonus Poker, Deuces Wild, etc. Jacks was the best base pay table for the bank of machines that had this progressive.