$1M Jackpot

Did you hit any jackpots? Did you get a great comp? We all want to know!
JoeRiley
Forum Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 10:34 am

Re: $1M Jackpot

Post by JoeRiley »

It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.

Tedlark
Video Poker Master
Posts: 7942
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am

Post by Tedlark »

JoeRiley wrote:
Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
The deal and the multiplier are totally separate of each other and not having a certain multiplier available on any certain hand being a violation of Nevada gaming regulations is, doubtful.

applepear86
Senior Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:06 am

Post by applepear86 »

JoeRiley wrote:
Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
Yea it's complete BS. If you're there in Nevada maybe call them and ask, stir up some drama lol.

Although maybe it comes under the same rule as them being able to limit bonus retriggers on slots, like they do on Cleopatra II. Either way, I think its completely unsportsmanlike on their behalf. We don't have limits on what we can lose on these machines, so they shouldn't limit what we can possibly win. The casino is swimming deep in so much juice anyways taking 2 and 3% out of the paytables it's still very profitable to them. If a multiplier averages every 15 hands, and a dealt royal is 1 in every 600,000 hands, that means a dealt royal gets multiplied every 9 million deals on average. That's 2.7 BILLION DOLLARS with a B run through the machine before a multiplied dealt royal at $300 a hand. They could spare a 2 million dollar 10x dealt royal with those kinds of long odds. Ridiculous!
Last edited by applepear86 on Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

applepear86
Senior Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:06 am

Post by applepear86 »

Tedlark wrote:
Sun Dec 11, 2022 1:48 pm
JoeRiley wrote:
Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
The deal and the multiplier are totally separate of each other and not having a certain multiplier available on any certain hand being a violation of Nevada gaming regulations is, doubtful.
Yea, this is probably the case

Tedlark
Video Poker Master
Posts: 7942
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am

Post by Tedlark »

applepear86 wrote:
Sun Dec 11, 2022 3:53 pm
JoeRiley wrote:
Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
Yea it's complete BS. If you're there in Nevada maybe call them and ask, stir up some drama lol.

Although maybe it comes under the same rule as them being able to limit bonus retriggers on slots, like they do on Cleopatra II. Either way, I think its completely unsportsmanlike on their behalf. We don't have limits on what we can lose on these machines, so they shouldn't limit what we can possibly win. The casino is swimming deep in so much juice anyways taking 2 and 3% out of the paytables it's still very profitable to them. If a multiplier averages every 15 hands, and a dealt royal is 1 in every 600,000 hands, that means a dealt royal gets multiplied every 9 million deals on average. That's 2.7 BILLION DOLLARS with a B run through the machine before a multiplied dealt royal at $300 a hand. They could spare a 2 million dollar 10x dealt royal with those kinds of long odds. Ridiculous!
This is a perfect example of why a player should know the rules of the game that they are playing before they play it. The player can then make an educated decision as whether or not to play a game.

daabearz
Forum Rookie
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2015 6:21 pm

Post by daabearz »

When it says multiplier comes on average every 15 hands, is that 15.0? or rounded from like: 15.4? 14.6?

Tedlark
Video Poker Master
Posts: 7942
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am

Post by Tedlark »

A player cannot have .4 or .6 of a hand.

FAA
Video Poker Master
Posts: 8478
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:58 am

Post by FAA »

Twitter is now worth a third of its $44 billion price, $15 billion. Elon Musk didn't need the headache all the way around, LL!

Tedlark
Video Poker Master
Posts: 7942
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am

Post by Tedlark »

FAA wrote:
Tue Jul 04, 2023 6:10 am
Twitter is now worth a third of its $44 billion price, $15 billion. Elon Musk didn't need the headache all the way around, LL!
How does this fit in with the theme of this thread?

olds442jetaway
Video Poker Master
Posts: 9303
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:08 pm

Post by olds442jetaway »

My best guess is 33.33333. I see no other way to make an attempt to fit.

Post Reply