Page 2 of 3
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
by JoeRiley
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 1:48 pm
by Tedlark
JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
The deal and the multiplier are totally separate of each other and not having a certain multiplier available on any certain hand being a violation of Nevada gaming regulations is, doubtful.
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 3:53 pm
by applepear86
JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
Yea it's complete BS. If you're there in Nevada maybe call them and ask, stir up some drama lol.
Although maybe it comes under the same rule as them being able to limit bonus retriggers on slots, like they do on Cleopatra II. Either way, I think its completely unsportsmanlike on their behalf. We don't have limits on what we can lose on these machines, so they shouldn't limit what we can possibly win. The casino is swimming deep in so much juice anyways taking 2 and 3% out of the paytables it's still very profitable to them. If a multiplier averages every 15 hands, and a dealt royal is 1 in every 600,000 hands, that means a dealt royal gets multiplied every 9 million deals on average. That's 2.7 BILLION DOLLARS with a B run through the machine before a multiplied dealt royal at $300 a hand. They could spare a 2 million dollar 10x dealt royal with those kinds of long odds. Ridiculous!
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:01 pm
by applepear86
Tedlark wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 1:48 pm
JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
The deal and the multiplier are totally separate of each other and not having a certain multiplier available on any certain hand being a violation of Nevada gaming regulations is, doubtful.
Yea, this is probably the case
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:10 pm
by Tedlark
applepear86 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 3:53 pm
JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 am
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
Yea it's complete BS. If you're there in Nevada maybe call them and ask, stir up some drama lol.
Although maybe it comes under the same rule as them being able to limit bonus retriggers on slots, like they do on Cleopatra II. Either way, I think its completely unsportsmanlike on their behalf. We don't have limits on what we can lose on these machines, so they shouldn't limit what we can possibly win. The casino is swimming deep in so much juice anyways taking 2 and 3% out of the paytables it's still very profitable to them. If a multiplier averages every 15 hands, and a dealt royal is 1 in every 600,000 hands, that means a dealt royal gets multiplied every 9 million deals on average. That's 2.7 BILLION DOLLARS with a B run through the machine before a multiplied dealt royal at $300 a hand. They could spare a 2 million dollar 10x dealt royal with those kinds of long odds. Ridiculous!
This is a perfect example of why a player should know the rules of the game that they are playing before they play it. The player can then make an educated decision as whether or not to play a game.
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 7:37 pm
by daabearz
When it says multiplier comes on average every 15 hands, is that 15.0? or rounded from like: 15.4? 14.6?
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:01 pm
by Tedlark
A player cannot have .4 or .6 of a hand.
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2023 6:10 am
by FAA
Twitter is now worth a third of its $44 billion price, $15 billion. Elon Musk didn't need the headache all the way around, LL!
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2023 8:47 am
by Tedlark
FAA wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 6:10 am
Twitter is now worth a third of its $44 billion price, $15 billion. Elon Musk didn't need the headache all the way around, LL!
How does this fit in with the theme of this thread?
Re: $1M Jackpot
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2023 9:41 am
by olds442jetaway
My best guess is 33.33333. I see no other way to make an attempt to fit.