Offer to Fa La La La La.... La la la la: Results (5th card flip)

[seagreen33]

I've been told that any court of law would welcome this "case" as they enjoy dismissing frivolous lawsuits. I've also been told that libel is expensive to prove.

[cddenver]

I've been told that any court of law would welcome this "case" as they enjoy dismissing frivolous lawsuits. I've also been told that libel is expensive to defend.



 
The person who told you that has much more experience with courts, lawyers, and judges than I do, so maybe I should take that advice.   On the other hand, I don't think many judges would take kindly to being told  about the hoops they'd have to jump through before the plaintiff would provide proof of his claim. 
 
Our friend scorp tried this one too, and it didn't work then, either. 

[seagreen33]

You know, I'm actually impartial in this issue. All I did was read the challenge as stated, and logically conclude that the results, by definition, would be inconclusive,
 
Others here are suggesting that the challenge is irrelevant, and that other absolute claims have been made. Because I'm not an email newsletter subscriber, maybe I should step aside, and let those with the "other" agenda continue,
 
You can't prove what can't be proven.
 
I am sure that we more agree than disagree.
 
I personally know of no one who has paid RS for anything that wasn't expected.
 
So I know of no fraud.

[Eduardo]

Seagreene, sine you say you know of no one who has paid RS for anything that wasn't expected, you obviously have followed him to an extent.
 
Please share with us to what extent that is.

[seagreen33]

Somewhere I ran across his name, maybe the 7 and a half years he wrote a column.............I don't know,
 
 
Personally, I, too, played losing AP for wayyyyyyyyyyy too long.
 
And I started to look beyond that paradigm. Everybody else was saying the same thing while being employed by the major casinos, and he was saying something different.
 
It just made sense to pay attention, if I wanted to achieve different results.

[cddenver]

Personally, I, too, played losing AP for wayyyyyyyyyyy too long.
 
And I started to look beyond that paradigm. Everybody else was saying the same thing while being employed by the major casinos, and he was saying something different.
 
It just made sense to pay attention, if I wanted to achieve different results.
 
There's absolutely nothing wrong with trying a different approach, but the  big question is, is different better?  Some seem to think that "different" automatically translates to "better".  Then there's the matter of how one would define "better".  That's what we seem to get hung up on. 

[Eduardo]

That's the problem. Understand that AP play makes VP one of the best bets in the casino.
 
You seem to assume that there is an approach that can perform BETTER than AP. That assumption is unfortunately false. People desperately want to grab on to "secrets" that can turn a game into a winning one. Guess what... it's no secret at all.
 
Trust me, if there were a way to BEAT the casinos at this game, Fa La La La La.... La la la la would not be the one to come up with it. And he would have far more believers than critics. Unfortunately, every argument I've seen critics make, makes more sense than Fa La La La La.... La la la la's claims.

[oej719]

You don't remember? How convenent? You are defending and promoting a guy and you want me to believe you can't remember. I have a good mind to call you a bigger clown than him. But I realize if you are not him but another shill like pianoboy and the others I offer my olive branch early on to put where the sun don't shine. You can figure out which end is the working end.

Somewhere I ran across his name, maybe the 7 and a half years he wrote a column.............I don't know,
 
 
Personally, I, too, played losing AP for wayyyyyyyyyyy too long.
 
And I started to look beyond that paradigm. Everybody else was saying the same thing while being employed by the major casinos, and he was saying something different.
 
It just made sense to pay attention, if I wanted to achieve different results.

[New2vp]

Somewhere I ran across his name, maybe the 7 and a half years he wrote a column.............I don't know, 
 
Personally, I, too, played losing AP for wayyyyyyyyyyy too long.
 
And I started to look beyond that paradigm. Everybody else was saying the same thing while being employed by the major casinos, and he was saying something different.
 
It just made sense to pay attention, if I wanted to achieve different results.First, I note that there were no specific rebuttals of what I call Fa La La La La.... La la la la's shrinking multiplier and how his reporting does not match his alleged experiment:  nearly EIGHT TIMES the random probability, then SEVEN TIMES the random probability, then more than SIX TIMES the random probability.  Does anyone see the progression here?  In another few months, we will be down to ONE TIMES the random probability.Instead now, we're talking about whether there was any financial harm generated by the pretense of an experiment (referring to legal definition of "fraud").Now, for the rest of the story.... where we find cracks in the armor of the latest reflection.In previous posts, you modeled yourself as an impartial observer who (1) is a strict but naive interpreter of arrangements (who didn't think anyone but Webman and Fa La La La La.... La la la la could interpret results, despite the reasonable expectation that the entire forum membership would see those results and interpret them based on their individual abilities), (2) picks no side in this argument,  (3) is specifically not an advocate for rs, (4) is possibly critical of him, and (5) "agree with all sides of this question," whatever that means.I was impressed at how well you controlled your temper and how well you stayed in character early on...except possibly for the statements getting more cryptic and obtuse at the same time.  (Another example:  "Yes you can replicate what has never happened.")I especially like statements such as, "You can't prove what can't be proven," you know, sentences that add no content whatsoever.  [If you had been around in 1967, and the Beatles had noted the extreme profundity of that statement, they could have no doubt added, your message about proofs to such other notable words to live by such as,"There's nothing you can do that can't be done
Nothing you can sing that can't be sung"There's nothing you can prove that can't be proven...oh well, i guess it doesn't really have the same ring.  But we can bear in mind the truth of the statement, "You can provide evidence for one side of an argument and with
enough evidence many can render a judgment as to which side is stronger.]Getting back to the main point:  You stepped out of character when rendering a position on whether fraud has been committed in a legal sense.  Based on your initial self-description, your opinion of no fraud is something that is irrelevant unless you are generally knowledgeable of Fa La La La La.... La la la la's transactions with others, which you couldn't be given your claimed independence from him.  How could you reasonably know whether anyone has suffered financial harm as a result of such irresponsible statements unless you were much closer to him than you have let on?And in this last post, you change your profile from an innocent bystander to a Fa La La La La.... La la la la supporter, using several of the mundane manifesto statements that are recognizable as Fa La La La La.... La la la la dogma, consistent with previous reflections.A lesson for future reflections.  Post very little and let the next argument be handled by another reflection.  The more you post, the more likely it is for you to blow your own cover.

[shadowman]

Personally, I, too, played losing AP for wayyyyyyyyyyy too long.
 
And I started to look beyond that paradigm. Everybody else was saying the same thing while being employed by the major casinos, and he was saying something different.

 
I guess I said the "same thing" but contrary to your statement I have never been employed by a major casino or a non-major one for that matter.
 
I too have played AP for quite some time and have managed to win almost every year. That you appear to be claiming that you lost makes me wonder exactly what you consider AP. I've known a few individuals that thought playing FPBP or FPJOB constituted AP. In and of themselves they do not.
 
Maybe you could provide some more details so we can have a better understanding of the reasons you were looking for another approach.