Gold Exclusive
My Favorites
That's a softball.As the FBI didn't investigate the speech, nor did the head of the FBI ever make any statement remotely close to she feltt her privacy was more important than the securiity of the country, i'm pretty sure the arrow points directly at lil old you.
She
-
notes1
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:18 am
whoever said the FBI investigated her speeches, if they had, with the multiple lies she told, it would have further proven she can not be trusted.
why not give us a another reason for her to have her own server, that was not protected by the government, and was likely hacked ?
why not give us a another reason for her to have her own server, that was not protected by the government, and was likely hacked ?
-
notes1
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:18 am
here we go again, history is repeating itself.
it was a little more than 4 years ago, 4 americans died at the consulate in Benghazi. obama was running for re-election, and like every pol, wanted to win. we were told the attack was caused by a video. can't win an election if the electorate don't believe you are doing your job or the terrorists are winning. the story about the video was a lie, they knew it soon after the attack happened and continued the lie. H's own emails prove she knew it was a terrorist attack.
move the clock forward 4 years and H is running for potus. terror attacks seemingly occur every couple of days. dems can't win an election if the electorate think the 'jv team' is not 'contained'. we are being told the terrorists are 'not an existential threat' to us. we are lead to believe it is just circumstance that these attacks are being brought to you by members of the 'religion of peace'. nothing to fear, the sun still rises and the birds are still chirping. the fear is just imagined.
forget the attacks occured at a nightclub, an airport, on the street of a community celebration, a mall, a work meeting, a sporting event, a train. forget the attacks were caused by guns (some in places where guns available to the public do not exist), knives, hatchet, truck, bombs. it is all imagined, it does not really exist.
another election, the want to win and continue their agenda, at any cost. another story to sell.
it was a little more than 4 years ago, 4 americans died at the consulate in Benghazi. obama was running for re-election, and like every pol, wanted to win. we were told the attack was caused by a video. can't win an election if the electorate don't believe you are doing your job or the terrorists are winning. the story about the video was a lie, they knew it soon after the attack happened and continued the lie. H's own emails prove she knew it was a terrorist attack.
move the clock forward 4 years and H is running for potus. terror attacks seemingly occur every couple of days. dems can't win an election if the electorate think the 'jv team' is not 'contained'. we are being told the terrorists are 'not an existential threat' to us. we are lead to believe it is just circumstance that these attacks are being brought to you by members of the 'religion of peace'. nothing to fear, the sun still rises and the birds are still chirping. the fear is just imagined.
forget the attacks occured at a nightclub, an airport, on the street of a community celebration, a mall, a work meeting, a sporting event, a train. forget the attacks were caused by guns (some in places where guns available to the public do not exist), knives, hatchet, truck, bombs. it is all imagined, it does not really exist.
another election, the want to win and continue their agenda, at any cost. another story to sell.
-
billryan
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:20 pm
here we go again, history is repeating itself.
it was a little more than 4 years ago, 4 americans died at the consulate in Benghazi. obama was running for re-election, and like every pol, wanted to win. we were told the attack was caused by a video. can't win an election if the electorate don't believe you are doing your job or the terrorists are winning. the story about the video was a lie, they knew it soon after the attack happened and continued the lie. H's own emails prove she knew it was a terrorist attack.
move the clock forward 4 years and H is running for potus. terror attacks seemingly occur every couple of days. dems can't win an election if the electorate think the 'jv team' is not 'contained'. we are being told the terrorists are 'not an existential threat' to us. we are lead to believe it is just circumstance that these attacks are being brought to you by members of the 'religion of peace'. nothing to fear, the sun still rises and the birds are still chirping. the fear is just imagined.
forget the attacks occured at a nightclub, an airport, on the street of a community celebration, a mall, a work meeting, a sporting event, a train. forget the attacks were caused by guns (some in places where guns available to the public do not exist), knives, hatchet, truck, bombs. it is all imagined, it does not really exist.
another election, the want to win and continue their agenda, at any cost. another story to sell.
Your scenario falls apart when one looks at a calendar.
It's not as if the administration tried to stall it until after the election. Unless you think that if the administration had said on September 12/13 that it was a terror attack that Romney would have won the election.
it was a little more than 4 years ago, 4 americans died at the consulate in Benghazi. obama was running for re-election, and like every pol, wanted to win. we were told the attack was caused by a video. can't win an election if the electorate don't believe you are doing your job or the terrorists are winning. the story about the video was a lie, they knew it soon after the attack happened and continued the lie. H's own emails prove she knew it was a terrorist attack.
move the clock forward 4 years and H is running for potus. terror attacks seemingly occur every couple of days. dems can't win an election if the electorate think the 'jv team' is not 'contained'. we are being told the terrorists are 'not an existential threat' to us. we are lead to believe it is just circumstance that these attacks are being brought to you by members of the 'religion of peace'. nothing to fear, the sun still rises and the birds are still chirping. the fear is just imagined.
forget the attacks occured at a nightclub, an airport, on the street of a community celebration, a mall, a work meeting, a sporting event, a train. forget the attacks were caused by guns (some in places where guns available to the public do not exist), knives, hatchet, truck, bombs. it is all imagined, it does not really exist.
another election, the want to win and continue their agenda, at any cost. another story to sell.
Your scenario falls apart when one looks at a calendar.
It's not as if the administration tried to stall it until after the election. Unless you think that if the administration had said on September 12/13 that it was a terror attack that Romney would have won the election.
-
notes1
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:18 am
there you have it folks. no disputing the facts from 4 years ago and the remarkable similarities now. what was not mentioned was the support of the media. just remember that fat POS candy Crowley pulling the rug out from Romney, when he had Obama on the defensive.
said it before, liberals are smart, clever, nasty and mean. get in the way of their vision, they will even eat their own, ala Bernie. if that means keeping blacks dependent on government to get their vote, so be it. if it means allowing illegals into the country, more dependents that will vote left. if it means cops get shot, casualties of the cause, brainwash the youth. pit one group against another to get votes. winning is all that matters. in their minds, the ends justify the means.
just ask yourself, if H is faced with a decision to either help the country of help herself. which will she choose? who will get thrown under he bus? (hint; email)
said it before, liberals are smart, clever, nasty and mean. get in the way of their vision, they will even eat their own, ala Bernie. if that means keeping blacks dependent on government to get their vote, so be it. if it means allowing illegals into the country, more dependents that will vote left. if it means cops get shot, casualties of the cause, brainwash the youth. pit one group against another to get votes. winning is all that matters. in their minds, the ends justify the means.
just ask yourself, if H is faced with a decision to either help the country of help herself. which will she choose? who will get thrown under he bus? (hint; email)
-
Tedlark
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
Come on edog, you're smarter than that. SHE is running for the office of President of the United States and her main opponent is Mr. Donald J. Trump. In case you are not aware: Mr. Donald J. Trump used to own several casinos in Atlantic City. There's your tie in to Atlantic City.
