Best Superbowl EVER
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4535
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:11 pm
Re: Best Superbowl EVER
As a NYG, fan, I have no love for either team, but my daughter is a big Eagles fan, so I am happy for her. She was a nervous wreck the last few minutes. Only prediction I made was that there would be mayhem in Philly if they won. I was correct on that. Funny that it didn't happen right after the game was over, but a few hours afterward. I guess it took time for the knuckleheads to drive in from Bucks County, Delaware County, South Jersey etc.
Nobody played D, that's what the NFL braintrust wants, that's why the rules greatly favor the offense now.
The scene in Philly was indeed ridiculous....worst sports fans on the planet. Now you have a stink raging that the BLM movement is claiming racism because the cops in Philly pretty much stayed on the fringes and let it happen, since the majority of morons swinging from street lights and destroying property we're white.
Still, congrats to the eagles and Nick foles, I like that guy...a very humble, Christian family man who almost didn't play this year in lieu of becoming a pastor.
Pats are still the greatest dynasty in nfl history, eight Superbowls in 17 seasons, five championships, in a 32 team league with a salary cap. Steelers six titles are separated by thirty four years, first four were before expansion, before salary cap, before free agency.
Nobody played D, that's what the NFL braintrust wants, that's why the rules greatly favor the offense now.
The scene in Philly was indeed ridiculous....worst sports fans on the planet. Now you have a stink raging that the BLM movement is claiming racism because the cops in Philly pretty much stayed on the fringes and let it happen, since the majority of morons swinging from street lights and destroying property we're white.
Still, congrats to the eagles and Nick foles, I like that guy...a very humble, Christian family man who almost didn't play this year in lieu of becoming a pastor.
Pats are still the greatest dynasty in nfl history, eight Superbowls in 17 seasons, five championships, in a 32 team league with a salary cap. Steelers six titles are separated by thirty four years, first four were before expansion, before salary cap, before free agency.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8558
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
According to records: the New England Patriots have 10 Superbowl appearances, 5 Superbowl victories. Just for accuracy.
The Pittsburgh Steelers have 8 Superbowl appearances, 6 Superbowl victories.
New England Superbowl winning percentage: 50
Pittsburgh Steelers Superbowl winning percentage: 75
The Pittsburgh Steelers have 8 Superbowl appearances, 6 Superbowl victories.
New England Superbowl winning percentage: 50
Pittsburgh Steelers Superbowl winning percentage: 75
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 5148
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:11 pm
eight Superbowls in 17 seasons, five championships
According to records: the New England Patriots have 10 Superbowl appearances, 5 Superbowl victories. Just for accuracy.
You're both right. 8 in 17 seasons and 10 total.
Am I to understand you two can now co-exist on this forum or am I going to get a long email/private message from both of you complaining that the other broke their end of the "contract" to not address the other and should be banned?
I see that neither of you "quoted" the other and thus only addressed one another "indirectly" but all this dancing around is getting old. I'm not going to repeatedly try to make judgment calls on where the "line" is that you guys have drawn. You are both clearly willing to respond but don't like being responded to.
What exactly should we do here?
According to records: the New England Patriots have 10 Superbowl appearances, 5 Superbowl victories. Just for accuracy.
You're both right. 8 in 17 seasons and 10 total.
Am I to understand you two can now co-exist on this forum or am I going to get a long email/private message from both of you complaining that the other broke their end of the "contract" to not address the other and should be banned?
I see that neither of you "quoted" the other and thus only addressed one another "indirectly" but all this dancing around is getting old. I'm not going to repeatedly try to make judgment calls on where the "line" is that you guys have drawn. You are both clearly willing to respond but don't like being responded to.
What exactly should we do here?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4535
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:11 pm
[QUOTE=DaBurglar] eight Superbowls in 17 seasons, five championships
According to records: the New England Patriots have 10 Superbowl appearances, 5 Superbowl victories. Just for accuracy.
You're both right. 8 in 17 seasons and 10 total.
Am I to understand you two can now co-exist on this forum or am I going to get a long email/private message from both of you complaining that the other broke their end of the "contract" and should be banned?
[/QUOTE]
I get banned for merely "alluding" to this...person who I can't even mention...responding in another thread to another poster (shinbo) who directly posted about ME, to ME about the single most prolific topic (ac gaming and legitimacy) that I've posted about for five years, all because this other... person who I can not mention...got po'd because that other person (shinbo) simply reiterated the self evident truth that the person who I cannot mention is obsessed with ANYTHING I post, and just proved it in this thread.
But hey, I'm good....
Edited to add: I've sent a few emails your way in the past webman, but I've never ever sent you one asking you to ban Anyone else except Myself, and I never would... I'm not a cowardly p...y like that...you are the boss... YOU are. Do whatever you feel is truly right, you know I'm good with whatever you decide.
According to records: the New England Patriots have 10 Superbowl appearances, 5 Superbowl victories. Just for accuracy.
You're both right. 8 in 17 seasons and 10 total.
Am I to understand you two can now co-exist on this forum or am I going to get a long email/private message from both of you complaining that the other broke their end of the "contract" and should be banned?
[/QUOTE]
I get banned for merely "alluding" to this...person who I can't even mention...responding in another thread to another poster (shinbo) who directly posted about ME, to ME about the single most prolific topic (ac gaming and legitimacy) that I've posted about for five years, all because this other... person who I can not mention...got po'd because that other person (shinbo) simply reiterated the self evident truth that the person who I cannot mention is obsessed with ANYTHING I post, and just proved it in this thread.
But hey, I'm good....
Edited to add: I've sent a few emails your way in the past webman, but I've never ever sent you one asking you to ban Anyone else except Myself, and I never would... I'm not a cowardly p...y like that...you are the boss... YOU are. Do whatever you feel is truly right, you know I'm good with whatever you decide.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:20 pm
Most of the casinos took a big hit on the game, with William Hill losing millions.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4535
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:11 pm
Most of the casinos took a big hit on the game, with William Hill losing millions.
Oh indeed, now THAT makes me smile, since I love it when casinos get hosed ( who doesn't?), Plus I am a die hard pats fans going all the way back to when they were a laughingstock in the 70s, but I'm not one of those sanctimonious types who won't bet against his team when it's smart to do so. Every pats Superbowl since 97 has been a competitive contest, yet the pats rarely cover or win outright vis-a-vis the line (except for 2001 vs Rams). Yesterday though, I didn't bet on either team, I just wisely took the OVER