SOOPER DOOPER.....Bowl time!

[edog743]

I think you have stars in your eyes Catty just like the one on the side of their helmets. If you look at it objectively you would see that.

[Rayser]

I am with you catty, he certainly did make a "football move" by stretching out for the goal line. He also took 3 steps toward the goal line, and his elbow hit down first. Completed catch at that point. The ground cannot cause a fumble.

[chattycattty]

I am very objective albeit a Cowboy fan. At that stage of the game in the event your observation was factual it was not conclusive. As webman says you are impossible to please and I am not going to change your mind and you are not going to change mind either. Anymore than Tedlark and DaBurglar are going to end their feud anytime soon.

[onemoretry]

I am very objective albeit a Cowboy fan.
What did you think of the non call (actually picking up the flag that was thrown) on pass interference in the Lions game?

I was amazed on that one - just as I was amazed that they overturned the call on the catch in the Packers game.

[chattycattty]

I did not understand that one either. I wonder some times with all the money bet on sports and on football in particular who referees the referees?

Maybe they just screw up in the heat of the moment. My most memorable officiating screwup was when Gallaraga threw a perfect game several years back, or I should say would of, but the umpire called the runner safe on what would have been the last play of the game.

[DaBurglar]

You know DaBurglar, maybe Tedlark is right? You really do make up words, when did I take a pot shot at the Buffalo Bills fans, all I mention is that Buffalo went to the super bowl 4 years in a row and that's not a dynasty.

Now your telling me the 2002 Oakland Raiders where a great team, or even you're 1985 New England Patriot team who had a quarterback threw more interceptions then touchdowns 17- 12 during the season, because they made it to the super bowl?

lol  YOU are the one making up things here!    I said you took a potshot at the BILLS, not their fans.    And how do you conclude that I said the 2002 Raiders are "a great team"?    Where did I say that?   Answer: I never said that......seriously, I defy you to identify the quote where I said the 2002 raiders are a great team?Your point is moronic:  If a team makes it to the super bowl then OBVIOUSLY they have had a great year....a great YEAR.    Not a great Dynasty.But you also still refuse to actually define what constitutes a Dynasty.......until you do you are arguing with yourself.   I already made my case and definition of what a Dynasty is.....I really am interested to know what yours is and why you DO NOT think the PAtriots from 2001 thru this year qualify.

[DaBurglar]

As usual DaBurglar jumps all over people who take an opposing "opinion" than his own. If DaBurglar thinks we were all just going to agree with him regarding his distorted view about how great the New England Patriots are; he should have spent more time doing research.

As for DaBurglar also alluding that he may know more about football then the people over at NFL.com I think that's a better laugh than thinking the Pats will beat Seattle. Even if the Pats were bumpedup from an honorable mention on the list this doesn't mean they would be elevated into the top 3 much less than the top spot.

I'm actually quite used to DaBurglar jumping on me by now and its too bad that his ego can't be as easily uninflated as a football can.   
I am about to expose Tedlark (once again) for the Hypocrite that he is.....also going to show that in terms of being "Dishonest" and fudging the facts, HE is the one who regularly does this........Please note the highlighted and Italicized portions above, and please also refer to Tedlark's other post in this thread where he defiantly and arrogantly states the my Patriots are NOT in the top 6 dynasties according to the website NFL.com (Ted says they get an "honorable mention though")      And make sure you keep in mind Ted's arrogant potshot telling me to "Do more research"  .....Now go to this website/URL......just click it! http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200000 ... nastiesYou will notice that this article on NFL.com clearly has my patriots as the number 5 dynasty of all time......all this arbitrary "TOP 6" crap and honorable mention stuff is, well, horse poop.    And please note that this list of dynasties was published in April of 2014, so it does not include THIS year's results with the PAtriots winning another AFC crown and making another Super Bowl appearance.   Obviously if this list/article is recompiled and republished after this year's super bowl is played, the patriots will rank higher (especially if they win!       I guess Ted thinks he just write or post anything, claim anything, and NO one is going to fact check it.      I doubt though he realizes just how stupid, arrogant, mean and just plain BAD this makes him look now.......I keep telling you Ted, Keep warning you, DO NOT SET YOURSELF UP LIKE THIS.....but you are just too arrogant to change.Oh and one last thing, I NEVER said I KNEW MORE THAN "THE FOLKS" at NFL.com    I clearly stated that all this is merely my OPINION.Only thing I do know is that I know more than Tedlark, at least when it comes to NOT making myself look like the biggest, most petty idiot in the world.

[Tedlark]

  DaBurglar do you think I just made up what I wrote about NFL.com and their bestowing the title of "honorable mention" to the New England Patriots? If you were angry before with NFL.com slighting the Pats like this why do you now use them to try and strengthen your position?    After Seattle defeats New England maybe NFL.com will downgrade New England even further because Seattle leapfrogged over New England?    How do we know the link you posted is not some virus that will try to take over our computers and make us think that video poker in Atlantic City is rigged?

[DaBurglar]

  DaBurglar do you think I just made up what I wrote about NFL.com and their bestowing the title of "honorable mention" to the New England Patriots? If you were angry before with NFL.com slighting the Pats like this why do you now use them to try and strengthen your position?    After Seattle defeats New England maybe NFL.com will downgrade New England even further because Seattle leapfrogged over New England?    How do we know the link you posted is not some virus that will try to take over our computers and make us think that video poker in Atlantic City is rigged?HAHAHAHAHA!!!!    u will not even click the link!    That's hillarious!   I totally win!!!But of course, you obviously DID click the link I posted, and this feeble post is all you can come up with.     Does not matter though....I could care less if you read the webpage I cited to refute your BS from before.   All I care about is that EVERYONE ELSE read what I cited (and NO it is not a virus or spam like you claim, and by the way WEBMAN will be talking to you about even MENTIONING or making this irresponsible post....man you just cannot help yourself, keep burying yourself further!!!)Oh, and Where is the nfl.com page YOU claimed that said the top 6 dynasties included a "honorable mention"?   Seriously, either you produce that webpage Ted or YOU are officially the liar.Game over

[Tedlark]

  Sorry DaBurglar I did not click on the link because I do not know for sure that it does not contain a virus or spyware.    I merely typed a few search words into yahoo (I believe it was NFL Dynasty football teams) and up popped the story from NFL.com.    I have found some interesting stories tonight about "Deflategate" and it appears that many, MANY, credible people are calling Tom Brady a cheat. Coupled with the other episodes of cheating that have had New England at the core and I think you may have your answer as to WHY New England may not be considered a "Dynasty" team.    Get some sleep DaBurglar, if you need a sleep aid just count the number of Super Bowls MY Pittsburgh Steelers have won, lol...