Royalless streak continues

[olds442jetaway]

[QUOTE=olds442jetaway]That means if I was playing a multi line game, I may have caught a Royal on another line than the center deal line on spin poker or the bottom line on multi hand games. I am not counting those. On a single line game, it means on the initial dealt hand, I was not dealt a Royal and when I drew my cards I did not catch the Royal either. I want to keep these numbers relevant to the 40-43k or so average number of hands between hitting a Royal in the long run on games such as Draw poker, joker kings, deuces wild, etc. I am not counting any double down stud games without a Royal here since you have no opportunity to draw to one and the average is nearly 700k between Royals.
I've been jumping from casino to casino the past few weeks and having a pretty decent run playing my usual single line $2 denom DDB. I've hit (2) Royals, (1)Aces w kicker, (3) quad aces, (2) quad 2-3-4's w/kicker and (6) quad 2-3-4's, can't really remember how many other quads I hit. One of Royal's I hit was a one card draw for a jack of spades and the other one I held a king of diamonds off the deal and hit the other four for the royal. About the same thing happened to me last year so I'm expecting a losing streak to set in any minute now. [/QUOTE]

     Good job KK. Keep them coming to make up for all of the prior torture....

[spxChrome]

[QUOTE=olds442jetaway]That means if I was playing a multi line game, I may have caught a Royal on another line than the center deal line on spin poker or the bottom line on multi hand games. I am not counting those. On a single line game, it means on the initial dealt hand, I was not dealt a Royal and when I drew my cards I did not catch the Royal either. I want to keep these numbers relevant to the 40-43k or so average number of hands between hitting a Royal in the long run on games such as Draw poker, joker kings, deuces wild, etc. I am not counting any double down stud games without a Royal here since you have no opportunity to draw to one and the average is nearly 700k between Royals.
I've been jumping from casino to casino the past few weeks and having a pretty decent run playing my usual single line $2 denom DDB. I've hit (2) Royals, (1)Aces w kicker, (3) quad aces, (2) quad 2-3-4's w/kicker and (6) quad 2-3-4's, can't really remember how many other quads I hit. One of Royal's I hit was a one card draw for a jack of spades and the other one I held a king of diamonds off the deal and hit the other four for the royal. About the same thing happened to me last year so I'm expecting a losing streak to set in any minute now. [/QUOTE]

KK: Its a marketing strategy... same reason you see all those gym and stop smoking ads at the beginning of the year. They are just luring in all those addicts who said they were going to quit at the new year. Now your hooked for the rest of the year

[ko king]

[QUOTE=ko king] [QUOTE=olds442jetaway]That means if I was playing a multi line game, I may have caught a Royal on another line than the center deal line on spin poker or the bottom line on multi hand games. I am not counting those. On a single line game, it means on the initial dealt hand, I was not dealt a Royal and when I drew my cards I did not catch the Royal either. I want to keep these numbers relevant to the 40-43k or so average number of hands between hitting a Royal in the long run on games such as Draw poker, joker kings, deuces wild, etc. I am not counting any double down stud games without a Royal here since you have no opportunity to draw to one and the average is nearly 700k between Royals.

I've been jumping from casino to casino the past few weeks and having a pretty decent run playing my usual single line $2 denom DDB. I've hit (2) Royals, (1)Aces w kicker, (3) quad aces, (2) quad 2-3-4's w/kicker and (6) quad 2-3-4's, can't really remember how many other quads I hit. One of Royal's I hit was a one card draw for a jack of spades and the other one I held a king of diamonds off the deal and hit the other four for the royal. About the same thing happened to me last year so I'm expecting a losing streak to set in any minute now. [/QUOTE]


KK: Its a marketing strategy... same reason you see all those gym and stop smoking ads at the beginning of the year. They are just luring in all those addicts who said they were going to quit at the new year. Now your hooked for the rest of the year [/QUOTE]
Eh, they had me at hello.

[olds442jetaway]

319,500 and counting!! Luckily, deuces quads and a few wild Royals bailed me out for the day.

[olds442jetaway]

I have a wierd feeling the no Royal streak will break this weekend. I don't care either way as long as some other premium hands come in. One reason I think this streak has lasted so long is I have had very few 3 to a Royal dealt. You will hit more Royals this way in the long run than being dealt 4 to a Royal. Anyway, will report back on what unfolds. Statistically, after 319,500 hands you should hit one probability wise, but of course the odds are the same on every hand dealt.

[olds442jetaway]

I guess the ESP wasn't working too well. 325,000 hands now and no deuces quads this time either. Double ouch!!

[olds442jetaway]

331,500 hands. A few small quads on job. No deuces quads.

[olds442jetaway]

339,000 hands now. Hit deuces quads on job twice. Played 15/9/4/4 dueces the same amount of time as job and no deuces quads. 4 chances at a Royal having been dealt 4, but couldn't connect Going to try a little tripple double bonus tonight. At least if I hit 4 Aces with the 2,3,or 4, it will pay the same as a Royal.

[BillyJoe]

339,000 hands now. Hit deuces quads on job twice. Played 15/9/4/4 dueces the same amount of time as job and no deuces quads. 4 chances at a Royal having been dealt 4, but couldn't connect Going to try a little tripple double bonus tonight. At least if I hit 4 Aces with the 2,3,or 4, it will pay the same as a Royal.
I read in another thread, Olds, that you have never been to Vegas. You need to get baptized !! That will get the RFs flowing.

[Lucky Larry]

I guess the ESP wasn't working too well. 325,000 hands now and no deuces quads this time either. Double ouch!!

Your ESP was probably OK it was your timing that was off.

Our positive thoughts are with you.