Is Dancerology based on 95% RNG?
-
ukaserex
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 67
- Joined Forum: April 3, 2016
- View Player Page
Re: Is Dancerology based on 95% RNG?
There's another aspect I need to look at - regarding a partnership Bob D. had when chasing that $100k royal..
I need to revisit his book and look at the deal. My guess is if you've got someone to front you the cash in a partnership, that takes a lot of pressure off - and you get the player points, too.
I need to revisit his book and look at the deal. My guess is if you've got someone to front you the cash in a partnership, that takes a lot of pressure off - and you get the player points, too.
-
onemoretry
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3140
- Joined Forum: March 3, 2009
- View Player Page
Please view my update-edited "taxable denom" post..Thank you all...and good luck Why do you think the denomination played makes any difference, assuming you report all your results, as you're supposed to?
-
rapidbison
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 51
- Joined Forum: December 28, 2016
- View Player Page
Why are comps/cashback boldly added as a positive to game returns [incl. .50 and higher denoms] in books, software, and chatter-----yet taxation seems to be conveniently omitted as a factored negative???
Playing any full-pay game that pulls a w2g----necessarily turns negative......
Playing any full-pay game that pulls a w2g----necessarily turns negative......
-
billryan
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4422
- Joined Forum: January 15, 2009
- View Player Page
You only pay taxes on your winnings at year end. Since you insist we are all playing a rigged game, shouldn't it follow that there will be no overall winnings come tax time?

























