Question for those playing UltX frequently.
How did you earn the million dollars you are now quickly frittering away?
I take it that you're not a fan of the game. I'm certainly with you on that - miles and miles too volatile for my taste!TripleTriple wrote: ↑Mon Oct 06, 2025 5:59 amQuestion for those playing UltX frequently.
How did you earn the million dollars you are now quickly frittering away?
They got the million dollars by starting out with a billion dollars.TripleTriple wrote: ↑Mon Oct 06, 2025 5:59 amQuestion for those playing UltX frequently.
How did you earn the million dollars you are now quickly frittering away?
atomic2025 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:08 amCasinos make a ton from UX.
Your strategy shifts based on the total multipliers in play, plus the expected return of your current hand and the potential next multiplier. It’s a whole different ball game compared to standard single-hand betting with 5 credits. In 10-play mode, the total multiplier can range from 10 to 120, meaning—technically—you’d need 111 distinct strategies to optimize gameplay.
I’m not sure how the exact return is calculated mathematically. Say you’re dealt A2358 (offsuit) on 9/6 DDB, with a total of 10 multipliers in play. If you’re betting 5 credits, holding just A yields a return of 2.367 credits, while holding A245 drops it to 2.021. However, in UX, you’d actually want to hold A245, because it gives you a chance to connect a straight, which comes with an 8X multiplier. The question is: what’s the exact expected return of holding A245 in UX? This feels like a Markov decision problem, but how do you precisely determine the expected return?
Bet! I'll take the over. I'd guess it's even way better than the chance of reverse sequential and sequential dealt royals both in diamonds on back-to-back hands.3for3 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2026 6:40 pmatomic2025 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:08 amCasinos make a ton from UX.
Your strategy shifts based on the total multipliers in play, plus the expected return of your current hand and the potential next multiplier. It’s a whole different ball game compared to standard single-hand betting with 5 credits. In 10-play mode, the total multiplier can range from 10 to 120, meaning—technically—you’d need 111 distinct strategies to optimize gameplay.
I’m not sure how the exact return is calculated mathematically. Say you’re dealt A2358 (offsuit) on 9/6 DDB, with a total of 10 multipliers in play. If you’re betting 5 credits, holding just A yields a return of 2.367 credits, while holding A245 drops it to 2.021. However, in UX, you’d actually want to hold A245, because it gives you a chance to connect a straight, which comes with an 8X multiplier. The question is: what’s the exact expected return of holding A245 in UX? This feels like a Markov decision problem, but how do you precisely determine the expected return?
Well, not exactly 111. Some of the combinations are impossible, ie 119. Many more of them are so unlikely as to be impossible, ie 118, which would require 9 FHs and 1 flush. I'd guess the chances of getting that combination are smaller than 1/the number of atoms in the universe.
Didn't realize you were having Chemo. Hope all goes well and that you will be better soon.olds442jetaway wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2026 3:09 amWith the Marathon sessions I play, I need a game that requires minimal thinking. For me, Bonus Deuces Wild fits the bill ok. Potential for really nice hits too. Since I’m dealing with what they call Chemo Brain from the Med stuff, I need to keep things simple.. If DDS had better pay tables, I would just play that. The Mrs does fine on Ultimate X though. That’s all she plays. Nickels too!