Player's rights upheld .Landmark VP decision?

[swivet]

I apoligize in advance if this was addressed here already; Please delete if so.

This was posted in the January Las Vegas Advisor Newsletter;

I would like to read more about the circumstances; Here's what was posted:

In what could eventually turn out to be a very important decision, a municipal court in North Las Vegas has dismissed a trespassing complaint brought by Jerry’s Nugget against a skilled video poker player. It means that the ejected patron not only has the right to be on the premises, but also can’t be prevented from playing video poker. If so, this could challenge the whole concept of 86ing players based on their skill at playing the games.


I've also read this may have something to do with a 'double-royal' promo from April 2010.

Does anyone here have more details, or the verbiage of the ruling, or any more info?

Thanks

[spxChrome]

What is a double royal promo?

[edog743]

Thats what WELU is going to win the current contest with

[shadowman]

What is a double royal promo?
 There are a variety of royal promotions. From this description I would guess you get paid double on every RF. This would add 2% to the return of any paytable which could make it very profitable for a high volume player.

[jm002546]

I apoligize in advance if this was addressed here already; Please delete if so.

This was posted in the January Las Vegas Advisor Newsletter;

I would like to read more about the circumstances; Here's what was posted:

In what could eventually turn out to be a very important decision, a municipal court in North Las Vegas has dismissed a trespassing complaint brought by Jerry’s Nugget against a skilled video poker player. It means that the ejected patron not only has the right to be on the premises, but also can’t be prevented from playing video poker. If so, this could challenge the whole concept of 86ing players based on their skill at playing the games.


I've also read this may have something to do with a 'double-royal' promo from April 2010.

Does anyone here have more details, or the verbiage of the ruling, or any more info?

Thanks
I have mixed feelings about this.  If they didn't limit this to single line 25 cent machines then they were asking for it.  On the other hand, who wants the pros popping in for their once a year visit to tie up all the good machines and kick their butt? They could have made some reasonable history of past play as a requirement.

[royal flush]

teribles had a double royal pay on mondays 6-12 am and pm but it said bottom line only so 9/6 job was aprox 1.5% positive plus points nice