April Contest Results

Discuss the latest contests, contest strategies, and scores!
Webman
Video Poker Master
Posts: 5153
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:11 pm

April Contest Results

Post by Webman »

Thanks to everyone who participated in our first 100-line contest here at
VideoPoker.com, featuring Hundred Play Draw Poker with Quick Quads! It was a lot of fun to watch, and we
hope you enjoyed it as
well.As always, we
saw some incredible high scores, times 100!For complete contest
results and
winners, click here!Winners
will be contacted by email and have 3 business days to respond and
claim their prize(s). Please specify appropriate clothing size for
apparel awards.We look forward to offering more
contests in the near future. As always, we appreciate your feedback.




cddenver
Video Poker Master
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by cddenver »

Congratulations to all the top winners in the main contest and secondary total QQ's contest as well as the site people who set it up!    WM must really LOVE his job to be here on a Saturday to get the results out.   
 
Next time, how about having the secondary part of the contest be based on the "most time wasted in losing effort"?  I'd have been in the money if that had part of this contest. 
 
 

dljpdx
Forum Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:14 pm

Post by dljpdx »

Great contest, had a lot of fun - thanks to the other players and the site staff!

bsa38patti
Forum Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:19 pm

Post by bsa38patti »

really enjoyed the contest, ty Webman

Nancy Lou
Forum Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:12 pm

Post by Nancy Lou »

Thanks for having contests; they are a lot of fun.  Looking forward to the next one!

wilcoxfun
Senior Member
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:10 pm

Post by wilcoxfun »

really enjoyed the contest and will be back to play again. Thanks webman and support staff for the great work you do here.

shadowman
Video Poker Master
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm

Post by shadowman »

So, CD, how did you do? I played a total of 20 times and came out ahead 10 times. I considered that to be a rousing success. Much better than my normal contest results. My best session was 159K and I even had 107 QQs in a session without being dealt one.

Peter90272
Forum Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:41 am

Post by Peter90272 »

I had a great time playing.My only dissapointment was that my score was not on the list.I was dealt a royal flush and i ended up with 523,000 points.
peter90272

cddenver
Video Poker Master
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by cddenver »

So, CD, how did you do? I played a total of 20 times and came out ahead 10 times. I considered that to be a rousing success. Much better than my normal contest results. My best session was 159K and I even had 107 QQs in a session without being dealt one.


 
SM, my best session was 158K, and best bonus score was 211 QQ's.  That was over 80 sessions!  I fully completed only about a quarter of them, though.  I was playing a mini-strategy geared towards the bonus part of the contest (QQ's count).  It became clear pretty quick that multiple dealt QQ's would be needed to make that second Top 100 list.  So I'd bail out of any session after 100 deals if I wasn't dealt any QQ's in the first 100 deals, my reasoning being that getting dealt multiple QQ's in the last 100 deals was even less likely than getting them dealt over 200 deals in the first place.  So I didn't want to "waste" any individual dealt QQ's in the last 100 deals of a session.

Webman
Video Poker Master
Posts: 5153
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:11 pm

Post by Webman »



I had a great time playing.My only dissapointment was that my score was not on the list.I was dealt a royal flush and i ended up with 523,000 points.
Yikes! Check again, you are on there now. It looks like the results initially did not include the last few hours of play and this has been corrected (time zone issue). It did not affect any of the prize winners, however. Congrats on a great score.

Post Reply