What is the correct play?
-
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:34 pm
What is the correct play?
In TDB/DDB you're holding 3 to a royal with a pair of aces.........what is the correct play?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
The pair of aces is the correct play.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:35 pm
I once had this hand. Kept the 3 to the royal and caught it!Name of the game is catch the royal!!!
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:00 pm
Name of the game is catch the royal!!!
Does that mean if you're dealt four aces, you discard three of them to go for the royal?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:35 pm
I once had this hand. Kept the 3 to the royal and caught it!Name of the game is catch the royal!!!
In TDB, I hold the Aces. AWAK = 4,000 coin same as RF.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:33 pm
The only time I break up a pair of aces is if one of them makes 4 to rf, in both TDB and DDB. 3 to royal is tempting but then I catch myself lol.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:23 pm
Even without an Aces premium, such as 9/6 JoB, the correct play is the high pair.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:07 am
I once had this hand. Kept the 3 to the royal and caught it!Name of the game is catch the royal!!!
You will catch the royal once every 1081 times you draw 2 cards to a 3-card royal flush. Although how much better the aces are than the 3-card royal depends on the exact cards and the exact pay table, from 9/6 DDB when you are dealt Ah Ac Kc Tc 5c and hold the suited AKT, you're giving up $3.54 --- assuming you're a 5-coin $1 player.Giving up that much equity for 1081 hands means that even when you hit the royal, you're $3800+ worse off going for the royal than holding the aces. And if perhaps you don't hit the royal "on schedule," you'll be $7800 further behind over those 1081 hands.For 9/6 TDB, the numbers are the same hand are bigger. You lose $4.41 per hand and $4700+ over the 1081-hand "cycle."I know recreational players are less concerned with exactly how much a bad play costs than professional players are --- but this particular error is HUGE and it happens fairly frequently. Anyone making errors this big is also making considerably more errors --- although thankfully this error is larger than most..Practicing using the red-light green-light feature available for Gold members on this site --- or practicing with Video Poker for Winners (or similar product) --- will save you tens of thousands of dollars a year if you're making mistakes like this. Even if you're a recreational player, wouldn't you rather give the casino $10,000 or $20,000 a year less than you're giving them now?Bob
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 2001
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:12 pm
It is that "catch the royal" mentality that makes it harder to find positive return paytables. The house always has the advantage. I choose to follow protocol rather than "gamble."
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:07 am
It is that "catch the royal" mentality that makes it harder to find positive return paytables. The house always has the advantage. I choose to follow protocol rather than "gamble."I understood your second sentence --- but if you meant it literally you are very incorrect. I didn't understand either of your other two sentences.Bob