Looks good on paper

Did you hit any jackpots? Did you get a great comp? We all want to know!
wildman49
Video Poker Master
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:45 am

Looks good on paper

Post by wildman49 »









wildman49
Video Poker Master
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:45 am

Post by wildman49 »


Math looks good on paper.Using a training site got a warning when I held 3 to the royal a .037 error. Said to hold 4 to the flush. I ignored the warning and play this hand the same way i would at the casino. Hit the royal.What would you hold?



Waiting4RF
VP Veteran
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:01 pm

Post by Waiting4RF »

I checked with VP Tutor app and verified the correct math play is to hold the 4 suited cards. So you made the wrong hold.

onemoretry
Video Poker Master
Posts: 3028
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:00 pm

Post by onemoretry »

What was the other dealt card?

Forget it ,I figured it out - it was an off-suit king.

FAA
Video Poker Master
Posts: 9166
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:58 am

Post by FAA »

To err is human. To forgive, divine.
-Alexander Pope

Waiting4RF
VP Veteran
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:01 pm

Post by Waiting4RF »

I was joking before. So there must be exceptions to the proper math plays.

Vman96
Video Poker Master
Posts: 3298
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:49 am

Post by Vman96 »

4 to a flush if I remembered the penalty exception. I hate hitting play money royals anyway.

I wouldn't blame anyone for "going for it" here though.

onemoretry
Video Poker Master
Posts: 3028
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:00 pm

Post by onemoretry »

I was joking before. So there must be exceptions to the proper math plays. No, there aren't. But, there are some situations involving penalty cards where the "second best" play is so close to the best one that it hardly makes much difference.

BobDancer
Video Poker Master
Posts: 1115
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:07 am

Post by BobDancer »

Whether 0.037 is a large or small error is a matter of opinion. To me it is HUGE. (In my writings i usually call it a 3.7 cent mistake --- assuming you are playing $1 denomination five coins at a time). If you're playing 50 cents or larger denomination, the error is much larger because the royal comes with a W2G --- which has real costs associated with it. How big the costs are depends on many factors --- including the state you are playing in, the state you reside in, your income level, and whether or not you file as a professional gambler.When a play is close --- and one of the play leads to a royal flush --- it makes far more sense to me for recreational players to make the play that AVOIDS THE ROYAL because they are really expensive. It's fruitless, of course, to try to convince them of this. They see the end result as a royal --- and the real decision was made before the royal came along. Vman wouldn't blame anyone who went for the royal on this hand. I don't go around blaming people. But I certainly would think the person who did it was very knowledgeable . And it's difficult to admire the intelligence of someone who voluntarily gives up EV to go for a result that's going to increase his taxes when it is successful.

DaBurglar
Video Poker Master
Posts: 4535
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:11 pm

Post by DaBurglar »


Whether 0.037 is a large or small error is a matter of opinion. To me it is HUGE. (In my writings i usually call it a 3.7 cent mistake --- assuming you are playing $1 denomination five coins at a time). If you're playing 50 cents or larger denomination, the error is much larger because the royal comes with a W2G --- which has real costs associated with it. How big the costs are depends on many factors --- including the state you are playing in, the state you reside in, your income level, and whether or not you file as a professional gambler.When a play is close --- and one of the play leads to a royal flush --- it makes far more sense to me for recreational players to make the play that AVOIDS THE ROYAL because they are really expensive. It's fruitless, of course, to try to convince them of this. They see the end result as a royal --- and the real decision was made before the royal came along. Vman wouldn't blame anyone who went for the royal on this hand. I don't go around blaming people. But I certainly would think the person who did it was very knowledgeable . And it's difficult to admire the intelligence of someone who voluntarily gives up EV to go for a result that's going to increase his taxes when it is successful.Hard to argue with this well reasoned post by our foremost expert on VP.   But I'll try anyway....Bob, the most successful VP player whom I have NEVER met, our very own Tedlark here on VP.com, would himself "go for it" in this scenario.....the fact that he wins so much and so often, over 80% of the time, leads me to think that for recreational players the best thing to do is to just go for it......But I get what you are saying, and from a Bob Dancer perspective, or any other "Professional" perspective, YOUR way is the best.

Post Reply