- 19D21FA6-2E65-46BB-8770-65A37D6507FC.jpeg (79.26 KiB) Viewed 4564 times
Lower royal was dealt again
-
olds442jetaway
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 11591
- Joined Forum: August 21, 2007
- View Player Page
-
gentlemobster
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 33
- Joined Forum: January 21, 2011
- View Player Page
-
TripleTriple
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 917
- Joined Forum: August 31, 2019
- View Player Page
Shoulda played 5 hand! Probably woulda gotten some 9's.
-
dinghy
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 2009
- Joined Forum: April 29, 2019
- View Player Page
Wow
You got the rank you needed, but caught every possible incorrect suit.
I've played a decent possibly indecent amount of Triple Play, and I'm not sure I've ever drawn two of the possible three.
-
QuadGod
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 39
- Joined Forum: July 5, 2015
- View Player Page
What are the odds of getting Ace high straights in a draw like that, each with a different suit (and missing the royal)—must be astronomical!
-
FAA
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 9567
- Joined Forum: May 28, 2014
- View Player Page
Yes, misery loves company. So, I will share yesterday’s SF. I was so short on funds by this time that it couldn’t ultimately yield a profit!
-
dinghy
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 2009
- Joined Forum: April 29, 2019
- View Player Page
I get 1 in 17,304 (multiplying 3/47 x 2/47 x 1/47).
But the drawing opportunity itself is rare. Dealt 4-to-a-royal cycle is 2764, and only one-fifth of those are missing the Ace. 17304 x 2764 x 5 = 239.1 million cycle.
If I played full-time, exclusively Triple Play, it would occur once every 149 years, imo. And it would probably happen on the day I forgot my camera phone in the hotel room.
-
FAA
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 9567
- Joined Forum: May 28, 2014
- View Player Page
Hey, it was max bet!

























