Offer to Fa La La La La.... La la la la: Results (5th card flip)

Discuss proper hold strategies and "advantage play" and ask questions about how to improve your play.
Post Reply
EDC1977
Video Poker Master
Posts: 2001
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:12 pm

Re: Offer to Fa La La La La.... La la la la: Results (5th card flip)

Post by EDC1977 »

Why does someone so head strong as pianoboy, just disappears as seaweed shows up? OEJ, I thought he was on a cross-country, "RTA" (romp thru America) where they would sign up new victims for his money making, Harrahs endorsed VP system? Should be no reason for him to continue testing. Even at the single nickel denom, it'll show up at a 40+ % rate for him and prove all else in the VP world wrong. With so many critics, why would he need enemies?

oej719
Video Poker Master
Posts: 1777
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:46 pm

Post by oej719 »

Rs has his own platform, which is his own website. Why does he not open a discusion forum on there where there can be 2 way dialogue? Because it would have no members or particapants thats why.
Also if he makes no money from the books why does he not let people download them for free at will from his website. Again this does not take alot to figure out why this has not happened.

seagreen33
Forum Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:43 am

Post by seagreen33 »

I will logically assume, that as a result of Webman's defined parameters for the "5th card challenge" are by, definition, inconclusive, that this thread ceases, relative to it's title, and RS is the winner.

faygo
Video Poker Master
Posts: 2925
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:55 am

Post by faygo »

Yup! He won the Gold Plated Spitoon.

seagreen33
Forum Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:43 am

Post by seagreen33 »

Oh, my.
 
Could you please elaborate?
 

oej719
Video Poker Master
Posts: 1777
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:46 pm

Post by oej719 »

I will elaborate. You and rs seem to be brain dead bozos for a lack of a better term.
When are you going to post some photos of your wife like the sweet pianoboy did?

Rs has his own platform, which is his own website. Why does he not open a discusion forum on there where there can be 2 way dialogue? Because it would have no members or particapants thats why.
Also if he makes no money from the books why does he not let people download them for free at will from his website. Again this does not take alot to figure out why this has not happened.
To rs: seems the bus does not run to your house.
Read as: the elevator does not go all the way to the top.


.

seagreen33
Forum Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:43 am

Post by seagreen33 »

I thank you for your input.

cddenver
Video Poker Master
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by cddenver »

I will logically assume, that as a result of Webman's defined parameters for the "5th card challenge" are by, definition, inconclusive, that this thread ceases, relative to it's title, and RS is the winner.


 
Well, that takes the cake - declaring RS the "winner" when the results of the test showed a 99.9999999998% probability that he simply invented his numbers.   My apologies to New2vp for leaving a few decimal places off that number.  Pretty conclusive statement on your part, for what you've said was an inconclusive test.  Sheesh.   The issue of "flips" has been dead and buried for months here and other forums, yet you and RS seem to think the jury was still out on this.  Why don't either of you want the truth about "flips" to come out?  The test results themselves were just a nice confirmation that everyone was able to see and understand.
 
You two "peas in a pod" are sure doing a lot of damage control for certified results that you both feel should be completely disregarded in favor of virtual ones.  Actions speak louder than words, and the attention that you both have given to the certified results show that you feel the results were pretty darn conclusive after all.  A stake in the ol' heart.  Thanks for clearing that up. 
 

Care to share with us why you defend him so strongly when you don't use any of his "strategies" and haven't ever met or communicated with him?  How about passing on any VP issues where you don't agree with him, such as randomness, regulations, progression play, strategy cards, etc.   Drop a compliment or two for Jean Scott or Bob Dancer.  Be your own guy, and don't just ride the "one rail" of unconventional thinking.
 

New2vp
Video Poker Master
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:02 am

Post by New2vp »






[QUOTE=seagreen33] 

If this remains unclear, then I will never post here again. It's still unclear, so "by definition",,,.  Who's the next Man in the Mirror?[/QUOTE]Seems our latest reflection, who's proven not to be a good logician is also not a man of his word.  His comments were clearly unclear, so based on his statement, he should never post here again.But we should expect this level of sincerity based on what he reflects.  Keeping one's word is a matter of honor.  Anyone surprised?But...Webman said the test wouldn't be conclusive!!!  And the check is in the mail.  And the government is here to help you.  And a used car salesman will always give you his best deal; just ask him.  And the pool hustler said he had just started playing.  But, they saa-iiid!So, because Webman made a statement, we will immediately cease to teach Statistics in the universities, since a sentence negates sampling theory and the conclusions that can be drawn from it.   We better cease all scientific testing until we can get an interview with Webman, because you know you cannot draw conclusions without Webman's blessing!Can you spell "naïve" (I'm purposely trying to be nice; there are many worse adjectives that would more properly describe this disingenuous drivel and the "driveler")...or would you need Webman to tell you what letters are available before you can arrive at a conclusion?A silly irrelevant man once said if you answer his unfounded, misguided attacks, you must be obsessed with him.  But if you don't, you must agree with whatever his last statement was.  No, this is NOT "by definition;" it's just what he says; it falls well short of being correct...or even logical.How's this for a more proper dilemma?  If I blow you out of the water for the 879th time, you're wrong.  And if I decide not to blow you out of the water for the 880th time...well, you're still wrong, the other 879 explanations still stand.  Theories or statements of silly man are wrong based on their content.  Whether I decide to spend my time pointing it out or not one more time is not relevant to its veracity.When blown out of the water, silly man will claim he always wanted to be in a desert, but that doesn't make it so.  Remember, he has demonstrated he has no honor and no credibility.  He is so starved for attention, he actually enjoys any mere mention even if his theories and he are being soundly destroyed.I may do this for the 880th time, I may not, but Webman's test obviously totally embarrassed silly man.  And why does he have nothing better to write about than what's posted here?  Is he obsessed?  Or just confused?  Silly man, can you reach a conclusion?

oej719
Video Poker Master
Posts: 1777
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:46 pm

Post by oej719 »

Silly man is a lonely, addicted, friendless, crazed , jealous bozo. I say all this in a good way of course.

Post Reply