October Contest Results: Super Times Pay

[Webman]

Thanks to everyone who participated in our October contest here at VideoPoker.com, featuring Super Times Pay. It was a lot of fun to watch, and we hope you enjoyed it as well.As always, we saw some incredible high scores. Both for the top scores as well as the bonus scores.For complete contest results and winners, click here!Winners
will be contacted by email and have 3 business days to respond and
claim their prize(s). Please specify appropriate clothing size for
apparel awards.We look forward to offering more contests in the near future. As always, we appreciate your feedback.

[Webman]

Congratulations to Eat, who I believe is the first ever participant to take the lead on Day One and maintain it all week. Nobody else has come close to that, and with a score of 45,615 it was well earned.

[janemichaels]

Congratulations, Eat. You were impossible to beat from the beginning! Now get GOLD

[shadowman]

Congratulations to all the winners.
 
On a side note I noticed that all of the top 100 scores for winning hands had total scores over 10000. This seems a bit odd unless the high score was not necessarily achieved in the same game.
 
Will have to think about it for awhile.

[cddenver]

Congratulations to all of the top winners! 


 
So, when does the next contest start, and what game will it be? 
 
EDITED:  Nice catch there, SM, there's definitely some sort of problem there.  I'm on the winning lines list twice with scores of 12K shown for both sessions.  I did have one 12K session in the contest, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't I hit it in either of those two sessions.  8K was my second highest score.  I was playing for winning lines and usually ended up with low points.
 
 

[New2vp]

Congrats to all the winners and all those that made the top 100 list.I think one of the most incredible sessions on the top 100 came in at #95.  hacky12 scored 16,690 but the top hand paid only 4020, meaning that there were 12,000+ scored not counting the top hand and there must have been 8600+ not counting the top 2 hands.hacky12 had several great hands, not just a single miracle like many on the list.Webman, This suggests another type of bonus prize that will have the same chance on every single entry but will not necessarily require a megamiracle.Track those that have the top scoring sessions NOT INCLUDING their best scoring hand (or best scoring 2 hands) during the session.Congratulations to hacky12 on a most unusual session with several "smaller" hits.

[New2vp]

Congratulations to all the winners.
 
On a side note I noticed that all of the top 100 scores for winning hands had total scores over 10000. This seems a bit odd unless the high score was not necessarily achieved in the same game.
 
Will have to think about it for awhile.I agree this is odd.  I didn't make the list but had several 300+ scores with games that were in the 3000-3500 range in total.cddenver is on the list twice with two different 12000+ scores, so the score listed could not always be the player's top score.

[New2vp]

Yeah, there is something wrong with the lists.  Sea Lion is #20 on the most winning sessions list.  There it shows him with 17,335 points, but that score should make the other top 100 list but does not.Same problem with Poker Princess, #64 on the winning lines list, showing 17,155, but not consistent with the top score list.  Ditto for Garfield, #62 on winning lines list showing 16,400.

[Webman]

Alright, I think the "most lines" scores are ALL off by 10,000 points. Since the games normally start at 10,000 and not zero, I forgot to subtract.  It will be fixed shortly.

[BillyJoe]

Way to go, Jane  Hung in there for a tee-shirt..