SHOWBOAT

[DaBurglar]

Thank you for confirming that you are a conspiracy theorist crank, Your very very very welcome.    Calling their complaint line or asking some boothling who works at a desk on the boardwalk is not going to get you an answer.    Yes I know....I think I pointed that out......did I not??  Writing a reasonable, concise letter to a lawyer working for the agency with a question of statutory interpretation is going to get you a response.
You can analyze and perhaps reject the response afterwards, depending on the answer you get, but you cant use the fact that you somehow know you are not going to like their answer as a reason not to pose the question.

Here, you're specifically positing a question about the NJ casino regs, and you have your own interpretation of what the law means. However, you won't bother to actually ask the people who enforce the law what it means, because you presuppose they will give you a fixed answer that will not only conflict with your definitive interpretation of the reg, but might conflict with your theory that the games are rigged.

Sorry, man, but this is where rational people check out.

  So check out already......or write your own letter and prove me to be what you accuse me of, that would be infinitely more satisfying for you anyway.   Whatever answer I get and share with everyone, you would never know if it were true or not....unless you ask the human lie detector shadowman.   Why dont you go play scrabble with Tedlark.....

[Tedlark]

  I prefer chess.

[Vman96]

Here, you're specifically positing a question about the NJ casino regs, and you have your own interpretation of what the law means. However, you won't bother to actually ask the people who enforce the law what it means, because you presuppose they will give you a fixed answer that will not only conflict with your definitive interpretation of the reg, but might conflict with your theory that the games are rigged.

Sorry, man, but this is where rational people check out.


This is what I would expect most lawyers to do, and in less math friendly ways that I have tried to explain this to him. And at least half of lawyers in New Jersey probably couldn't fully understand New Jersey's rules are equivalent to Nevada with respect to video poker. They are actually quite difficult for people that are not math experts to understand that they end up being equivalent to Nevada, and many other states' laws.

[JT]

  So check out already......or write your own letter and prove me to be what you accuse me of, that would be infinitely more satisfying for you anyway.   Whatever answer I get and share with everyone, you would never know if it were true or not....unless you ask the human lie detector shadowman.   Why dont you go play scrabble with Tedlark.....

I need not write my own letter -- I'm not the one trying to prove that the games are non-random, or randomly non-random, or whatever you want to call it.   You're the one with the proposition that the NJ law allows the games to deviate from a drawn deck, so therefore you are the one who must prove that claim.   Much like people who claim UFO's or miracles or faith healing -- extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.   I'm not the one trying to convince the world the games are rigged, you are.   So, put up, or shut up.

So, yeah.   Checked out.   

Vman -- Exactly.   But again, our interpretation really doesn't matter, the only one that does, is the NJCCC's.   

[Tedlark]

JT are you up for a game of chess? I must warn you though, I watched the movie: "Searching for Bobby Fischer" the other night and I'm feeling pretty pumped about my chess game.

[JT]

JT are you up for a game of chess? I must warn you though, I watched the movie: "Searching for Bobby Fischer" the other night and I'm feeling pretty pumped about my chess game.


I used to be pretty good, I was on my high school chess team. But I don't play anymore, since I believe the game is rigged.

[Tedlark]