CS Revisited

[onemoretry]

A few people have financial motivations for shutting down all discussion of CS,

There are times when I think there must be two different people posting under the FloridaPhil moniker.

There is the one who posts eminently sensible stuff. And, there is the the one who clings to the inane theory that his CS baby represents such a threat to the casinos that they are shaking in their boots, and who posts this hogwash.

[FAA]

inane theory that his CS baby represents such a threat to the casinos
that they are shaking in their boots, and who posts this hogwash.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------You misinterpret. But I'll let the man explain.

[billryan]

Or you could let the math speak for itself. Oh , that doesn't work, does it?

[FloridaPhil]

CS math works fine, but some people don't read posts. They just talk...

No one ever said CS was a way to do anything other than limit losses on a negative game. If you can't understand that, you don't understand math. The reason casinos don't like CS is not because they are afraid someone will make a killing using it. That's ridiculous. The reason they don't like single coin play is it keeps players from losing as much which cuts into their profit. What part of this don't you understand?