Speaking of Royals
-
billryan
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4422
- Joined Forum: January 15, 2009
- View Player Page
Re: Speaking of Royals
[QUOTE=billryan] Harrah's sucks, particularly Harrah's Laughlin.
What's the problem with Harrah's Laughlin? [/QUOTE
It sucks. Old and tired. Plus they no longer offer Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
What's the problem with Harrah's Laughlin? [/QUOTE
It sucks. Old and tired. Plus they no longer offer Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
-
onemoretry
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3138
- Joined Forum: March 3, 2009
- View Player Page
It sucks. Old and tired. Plus they no longer offer Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
But, they do offer "not too bad" video poker. And, unlike many CET properties, tier credits are still $10 per.
By "not too bad", I mean 8/5 bonus poker, 98.91% deuces wild, and the game we play a whole lot there, multiline 98.8% bonus deuces wild.
I don't really care about Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
-
billryan
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4422
- Joined Forum: January 15, 2009
- View Player Page
[QUOTE=billryan]
It sucks. Old and tired. Plus they no longer offer Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
But, they do offer "not too bad" video poker. And, unlike many CET properties, tier credits are still $10 per.
By "not too bad", I mean 8/5 bonus poker, 98.91% deuces wild, and the game we play a whole lot there, multiline 98.8% bonus deuces wild.
I don't really care about Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
[/QUOTE]
I think their VP stinks, especially the 50 and 100 play games.
It sucks. Old and tired. Plus they no longer offer Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
But, they do offer "not too bad" video poker. And, unlike many CET properties, tier credits are still $10 per.
By "not too bad", I mean 8/5 bonus poker, 98.91% deuces wild, and the game we play a whole lot there, multiline 98.8% bonus deuces wild.
I don't really care about Buffalo Chicken Wraps.
[/QUOTE]
I think their VP stinks, especially the 50 and 100 play games.
-
mulleon
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 21
- Joined Forum: June 9, 2015
- View Player Page
It's a CET property enough said. The VP has horrible pay tables and its $10 or more per point. Why bother. Go on down the street (stop by In & Out Burger for me) or hop on the water taxi to Aquarius they have better pay tables.
-
Vman96
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3298
- Joined Forum: July 26, 2011
- View Player Page
I think their VP stinks, especially the 50 and 100 play games.
Most 50/100 play games suck everywhere. Cosmopolitan Las Vegas is a notable Strip exception for dimes.
-
Galeygoo
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 773
- Joined Forum: September 3, 2009
- View Player Page
[QUOTE=billryan]
I think their VP stinks, especially the 50 and 100 play games.
Most 50/100 play games suck everywhere. Cosmopolitan Las Vegas is a notable Strip exception for dimes.[/QUOTE]So....it's the "right kind of wrong"? sorry, much be watching too much tv
-
billryan
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 4422
- Joined Forum: January 15, 2009
- View Player Page
[QUOTE=billryan]
I think their VP stinks, especially the 50 and 100 play games.
Most 50/100 play games suck everywhere. Cosmopolitan Las Vegas is a notable Strip exception for dimes.[/QUOTE]
True but Harrah's are suckier.
I think their VP stinks, especially the 50 and 100 play games.
Most 50/100 play games suck everywhere. Cosmopolitan Las Vegas is a notable Strip exception for dimes.[/QUOTE]
True but Harrah's are suckier.
-
onemoretry
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3138
- Joined Forum: March 3, 2009
- View Player Page
True but Harrah's are suckier.
I guess our standards are different. To me, playing a 50 line 5c 98.8% game isn't terrible, and it's usually a lot of fun.
And, is single line 8/5 bonus poker for $1, $2 or $5 really a horrible game? Or, multiline (3,5 or 10) 98.91% deuces wild for 25 or 50c?
-
Taff
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 1
- Joined Forum: August 30, 2010
- View Player Page
Enjoy the game, winning is a bonus.
-
FloridaPhil
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 6229
- Joined Forum: July 19, 2008
- View Player Page
[quote=Taff]Enjoy the game, winning is a bonus.[/quote]

























