Ted, a terrific illustration (the Broken Record) that a picture is worth 1,000 words. Following are my less effectual 1,000 words:
I'm particularly taken with the latest mode of repeating without technically repeating: Continual posting of daily session results. And I have noted his remarkable discipline. While originally stating that he would stop when he reached his daily loss limit of 500 coins, I have noticed that has frequently morphed into multiple sessions per day on more than one occasion.
How about if we stipulate with a 45,000 credit lead, it will take more than a couple million hands for the small house edge to move his lifetime total down to an expectation of 0 credits?
As if his daily sessions of undetermined length are of great interest, pedagogical or otherwise, to anyone. Or that his positive total on a particular game proves (or even illustrates) anything at all. Ok, about 90% of the time, you will bust the 500 credits and the rest of the time, you will reach or surpass a target surplus of 4000 credits. How many posts does it take to illustrate that?
On this website, having 45,000 credits on one game (while having fewer than 10,000 credits on countless other games) is not even proof of profits over the website's lifetime of play … even on that single game. One could have gone "bankrupt" multiple times on that particular game and the player is rewarded with a fresh infusion of another 10,000 credits. There is no way to tell how many times that might have happened in the past by looking at a total.
I get that he is enamored with everything he does or has done in his lifetime in the past. I get that he has a compulsion about posting. I do wonder whether he has memory issues … whether he has a condition that prevents him from recalling that he has previously conveyed the same message, perhaps many times in the past.
I get that he is trying to emphasize that he has been a big winner in some sense. Or that his theory that theory doesn't matter has some validity.
Way back when the game first came out I played a lot of Wheel Poker with Quick Quads, often dualing with cddenver late night prior to when Webman started tracking high scores for the days. I just checked and my total there is 166,068 credits. Does that mean that my posts have four times the credibility of his posts? Rhetorical question. I will freely admit to going bankrupt on many other games probably more than 16 times that might balance out against my luck with this game. And, no, though I imagine (using his logic) that many want to see whether that balance can remain if I play future sessions this year, I will not be posting future session results.

Outside of when the game is in a contest, I likely won't even be playing it.
Ted, I know you didn't take the bait when I thought there might be a counter to his claim that he gets high score of the day as much as anyone else. At the time that I checked, your edge over his claim of being as good as everyone else in this category looked like this: Tedlark 694 times to his 24 times. Not really much of a "contest." Heck, I haven't played significant amounts other than the contests and brand new games and I've accidentally recorded 27 times, probably virtually none of these in the last several years.
Oh well, I'm braced for continued repeating phrases that somehow this is Bob Dancer's fault. Or some other answer. Maybe he could trademark the "response that is non-responsive." Or he can always go back to complaining that those that disagree with him when he trashes others are mean-spirited jerks.