Does the past matter?

[stevel96a1]

well why not? it worked for Bart Hanson it worked for Bob Dancer 1:1 would put me at a 60% chance to see a royal and i believe they caught their royals early in

if i can put up .10:1 and hit it (more than once ofcourse ) then i too can have same end result as the rest

Jstark you keep playing your quarter games alright? be king of the hill of quarters while everyone will have winning years playing on the 2$ tables like Faa saw a man rake in 8k$ royal

ive seen simulations that turned 250$ BR into a number you wouldn't believe, does it happen often? god no can it happen? certainly is the frequency there? im going to find out

[Player422738]

After this 6-page long discussion and if you still can’t understand or can’t be convinced, then you are most likely ass. You should avoid of playing video poker at all.

We can do without these types of comments. Steve's questions are legitimate. Lots of players can't understand how a strategy based on math can yield different results. Math is an exact science. The answer to what is 2 plus 2 is always 4. It's not 3 for player number one and 7 for player number two. Video poker math is not exact. The answer always allows for all possible results. This ranges from making a million dollars in six months to going totally bankrupt.

I used the right word for sure.

I bet most people here share the same thought as I do but just avoid of speaking out.

But I don't care. He is @$$. Period.

[Jstark]

well why not? it worked for Bart Hanson it worked for Bob Dancer 1:1 would put me at a 60% chance to see a royal and i believe they caught their royals early in

if i can put up .10:1 and hit it (more than once ofcourse ) then i too can have same end result as the rest

Jstark you keep playing your quarter games alright? be king of the hill of quarters while everyone will have winning years playing on the 2$ tables like Faa saw a man rake in 8k$ royal

ive seen simulations that turned 250$ BR into a number you wouldn't believe, does it happen often? god no can it happen? certainly is the frequency there? im going to find out

Bart Hanson is a semi-wealthy poker player. His VP play is for fun. If what you're trying to do is to "get lucky" once to get ahead, give it a try.

[stevel96a1]

After this 6-page long discussion and if you still can’t understand or can’t be convinced, then you are most likely ass. You should avoid of playing video poker at all.

We can do without these types of comments. Steve's questions are legitimate. Lots of players can't understand how a strategy based on math can yield different results. Math is an exact science. The answer to what is 2 plus 2 is always 4. It's not 3 for player number one and 7 for player number two. Video poker math is not exact. The answer always allows for all possible results. This ranges from making a million dollars in six months to going totally bankrupt.

I used the right word for sure.

I bet most people here share the same thought as I do but just avoid of speaking out.

But I don't care. He is @$$. Period.

if anyone is an ass its you (from an elephant) again you are very much like Carl Sagan narrow mind and small vision "the typical response is what do you think the sky color should be bluue??" thats very discourage to say the least from people like you Hop you are an elephants butt hole to supress my way of thinking and supress my way of asking questions again Butt hole =)

[stevel96a1]

well why not? it worked for Bart Hanson it worked for Bob Dancer 1:1 would put me at a 60% chance to see a royal and i believe they caught their royals early in

if i can put up .10:1 and hit it (more than once ofcourse ) then i too can have same end result as the rest

Jstark you keep playing your quarter games alright? be king of the hill of quarters while everyone will have winning years playing on the 2$ tables like Faa saw a man rake in 8k$ royal

ive seen simulations that turned 250$ BR into a number you wouldn't believe, does it happen often? god no can it happen? certainly is the frequency there? im going to find out

Bart Hanson is a semi-wealthy poker player. His VP play is for fun. If what you're trying to do is to "get lucky" once to get ahead, give it a try.

so what? video poker is video poker and money is money if he can do it so can i, i just can't do it right away like he can

this site is a great site much like prison they have schools in prison, gyms, activities its the people who make it bad and poor the structure itself isn't the issue again like this site its the people like Jstark or hop who make it crummy, theres another website on gambling who discuss progressions in baccarat and they actually get somewhere but here all i get is negative nancys from a holes like bill and know it all from jstark poor attitude determines fate =/

[stevel96a1]

Web man you can close this thread/post i tried using logic. the mirror of the past a bankroll approach but all these fools just revert to end if my name isn't Bob dancer or Bart Hanson or Jean Scott i have no business voicing my ideas and approaches onto this site

[Player422738]

After this 6-page long discussion and if you still can’t understand or can’t be convinced, then you are most likely ass. You should avoid of playing video poker at all.

We can do without these types of comments. Steve's questions are legitimate. Lots of players can't understand how a strategy based on math can yield different results. Math is an exact science. The answer to what is 2 plus 2 is always 4. It's not 3 for player number one and 7 for player number two. Video poker math is not exact. The answer always allows for all possible results. This ranges from making a million dollars in six months to going totally bankrupt.

I used the right word for sure.

I bet most people here share the same thought as I do but just avoid of speaking out.

But I don't care. He is @$$. Period.

if anyone is an ass its you (from an elephant) again you are very much like Carl Sagan narrow mind and small vision "the typical response is what do you think the sky color should be bluue??" thats very discourage to say the least from people like you Hop you are an elephants butt hole to supress my way of thinking and supress my way of asking questions again Butt hole =)

You have no idea about what you are talking about and you have been wasting people's time here.

Sky is blue. Period.

You are the Butt Hole. Period.

[Player422738]

Web man you can close this thread/post i tried using logic. the mirror of the past a bankroll approach but all these fools just revert to end if my name isn't Bob dancer or Bart Hanson or Jean Scott i have no business voicing my ideas and approaches onto this site

The 3 people you mentioned do not have more knowledge than you are expecting. And by Bob Dancer's characteristics and his patience, he may uses different words like dimwit, or dum@ss to refer you.

1 + 1 = 2. Einstein knows it, we know it too.

If you don't believe it, call yourself ass and an idiot. But you are welcome by casinos. They like morons.

[stevel96a1]

After this 6-page long discussion and if you still can’t understand or can’t be convinced, then you are most likely ass. You should avoid of playing video poker at all.

We can do without these types of comments. Steve's questions are legitimate. Lots of players can't understand how a strategy based on math can yield different results. Math is an exact science. The answer to what is 2 plus 2 is always 4. It's not 3 for player number one and 7 for player number two. Video poker math is not exact. The answer always allows for all possible results. This ranges from making a million dollars in six months to going totally bankrupt.

I used the right word for sure.

I bet most people here share the same thought as I do but just avoid of speaking out.

But I don't care. He is @$$. Period.

if anyone is an ass its you (from an elephant) again you are very much like Carl Sagan narrow mind and small vision "the typical response is what do you think the sky color should be bluue??" thats very discourage to say the least from people like you Hop you are an elephants butt hole to supress my way of thinking and supress my way of asking questions again Butt hole =)

You have no idea about what you are talking about and you have been wasting people's time here.

Sky is blue. Period.

You are the Butt Hole. Period.

no **** the sky is blue, i guess you never watched BBC Carl Sagan episode otherwise you would get the reference.

im wasting your time? then why open the post if you already reading the head-line? again shows you are dumb

im a buthole? you started with the name calling which tells me you are the @sshole here all i did was look at the game differently but you sir are resorting to name calling, Webman i demand you to take action upon his account

[stevel96a1]

Web man you can close this thread/post i tried using logic. the mirror of the past a bankroll approach but all these fools just revert to end if my name isn't Bob dancer or Bart Hanson or Jean Scott i have no business voicing my ideas and approaches onto this site

The 3 people you mentioned do not have more knowledge that you are expecting. And by Bob Dancer's characteristics and his patience, he may uses different words like dimwit, or dum@ss to refer you.

1 + 1 = 2. Einstein knows it, we know it too.

If you don't believe it, call yourself ass and an idiot. But you are welcome by casinos. They like morons.

i had no idea my post thread can lead to Hop to calling me names and be so disgruntled, take it easy man and take your meds it sounds like you need it...