$1M Jackpot
-
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 10:34 am
Re: $1M Jackpot
It also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8038
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
The deal and the multiplier are totally separate of each other and not having a certain multiplier available on any certain hand being a violation of Nevada gaming regulations is, doubtful.JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 amIt also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:06 am
Yea it's complete BS. If you're there in Nevada maybe call them and ask, stir up some drama lol.JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 amIt also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
Although maybe it comes under the same rule as them being able to limit bonus retriggers on slots, like they do on Cleopatra II. Either way, I think its completely unsportsmanlike on their behalf. We don't have limits on what we can lose on these machines, so they shouldn't limit what we can possibly win. The casino is swimming deep in so much juice anyways taking 2 and 3% out of the paytables it's still very profitable to them. If a multiplier averages every 15 hands, and a dealt royal is 1 in every 600,000 hands, that means a dealt royal gets multiplied every 9 million deals on average. That's 2.7 BILLION DOLLARS with a B run through the machine before a multiplied dealt royal at $300 a hand. They could spare a 2 million dollar 10x dealt royal with those kinds of long odds. Ridiculous!
Last edited by applepear86 on Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:06 am
Yea, this is probably the caseTedlark wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 1:48 pmThe deal and the multiplier are totally separate of each other and not having a certain multiplier available on any certain hand being a violation of Nevada gaming regulations is, doubtful.JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 amIt also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8038
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
This is a perfect example of why a player should know the rules of the game that they are playing before they play it. The player can then make an educated decision as whether or not to play a game.applepear86 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 3:53 pmYea it's complete BS. If you're there in Nevada maybe call them and ask, stir up some drama lol.JoeRiley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:25 amIt also seems to me that withholding certain multipliers on certain hands totally violates the Nevada (and other states?) regulation that every single deal must be COMPLETELY random. This has come up before in the non-random design of certain games that were rejected by the Nevada gaming commission.
Although maybe it comes under the same rule as them being able to limit bonus retriggers on slots, like they do on Cleopatra II. Either way, I think its completely unsportsmanlike on their behalf. We don't have limits on what we can lose on these machines, so they shouldn't limit what we can possibly win. The casino is swimming deep in so much juice anyways taking 2 and 3% out of the paytables it's still very profitable to them. If a multiplier averages every 15 hands, and a dealt royal is 1 in every 600,000 hands, that means a dealt royal gets multiplied every 9 million deals on average. That's 2.7 BILLION DOLLARS with a B run through the machine before a multiplied dealt royal at $300 a hand. They could spare a 2 million dollar 10x dealt royal with those kinds of long odds. Ridiculous!
-
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2015 6:21 pm
When it says multiplier comes on average every 15 hands, is that 15.0? or rounded from like: 15.4? 14.6?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8038
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
A player cannot have .4 or .6 of a hand.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:58 am
Twitter is now worth a third of its $44 billion price, $15 billion. Elon Musk didn't need the headache all the way around, LL!
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8038
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 9545
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:08 pm
My best guess is 33.33333. I see no other way to make an attempt to fit.