Fa La La La La.... La la la la vs. "Shadowman"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:03 pm
Fa La La La La.... La la la la vs. "Shadowman"
Here you go, gentleman. A nice clean pad for you to do your back and forth. I'm not taking sides or assesing blame, just a little tired of wading through this.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:18 pm
It's actually me against any number of folks here who believe they can beat the casinos at their own game---the math. My entire point is that I've tried it for 6 years and never once did it work (or even make sense to play that way because of the loooong hours in stinky casinos and eventual addiction to playing so often). On the flip side, my critics have NEVER played my strategy but they feel their classroom knowledge qualifies them as an expert over someone who has played that way for 10 years, has been consistently successful in doing so exactly as the strategy predicted when developed, and who frustrates them just by reporting on my success.
The bottom line is and will always be: Winners like to see others win; Losers do not.
The bottom line is and will always be: Winners like to see others win; Losers do not.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:46 pm
The bottom line is and will always be: Winners like to see others win; Losers do not.
Solution = just show them your winnings. That will prove your point and save you a lot of time to enjoy other things in life.
If it was me I would post each W2G and follow it by a photo of my big white a** for them to kiss
No need to bet anyone about it being true. It would help alot of people who want to believe you. You would convert a multitude of people and your case would be closed. The others all would be shamed and disappear in defeat.
Any logical person will play the way that they feel will make them the most money.
So I say just SHOW THEM THE MONEY. lol
Solution = just show them your winnings. That will prove your point and save you a lot of time to enjoy other things in life.
If it was me I would post each W2G and follow it by a photo of my big white a** for them to kiss
No need to bet anyone about it being true. It would help alot of people who want to believe you. You would convert a multitude of people and your case would be closed. The others all would be shamed and disappear in defeat.
Any logical person will play the way that they feel will make them the most money.
So I say just SHOW THEM THE MONEY. lol
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:18 pm
oej719: I've already done that many times over. After way too many requests by the Editor @ GT (because some people just don't want to believe my results) they got tired of producing the evidence for the critics and I got tired of producing it to them. Of course you know it did no good anyway--they just peel down another layer after layer of the onion until nothing's left. "How do we know he didn't print them on his computer?" or "He probably did what most of us do and lost every penny of that big hit and more, but he's not telling us about it." People won't believe what they just don't want to believe or can't stomach. But they have no problem believing Bob Dancer hit 110 royals in a 6-month period on $5 and above, simply because he incorporated the situation into fitting into what the math says should or could happen. And who questions Jean Scott when she reports how she won $40k playing a $5 five-play machine FOR 3 DAYS to qualify to get the $10k entry fee back for a Caesar's slot tournament, yet for some reason she didn't have the money to go at it alone and needed a backer in order to come up with the up-front fee. The nonsense goes on and on and on, and it only serves to verify what I've been saying about the myth of advantage play over the years. Astute players listen to me and understand what I'm saying, and that helps them realize that I know what i'm talking about when I show them how to play correctly for profit.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
So I say just SHOW THEM THE MONEY. lol
Nice try, Joe. I do believe Fa La La La La.... La la la la's response says everything you need to know about him. All talk. When faced with a simple request to back up his claims all he can do is bad-mouth others.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
Here you go, gentleman. A nice clean pad for you to do your back and forth. I'm not taking sides or assesing blame, just a little tired of wading through this.
Good idea.
Good idea.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:18 pm
"Nice try, Joe. I do believe Fa La La La La.... La la la la's response says everything you need to know about him. All talk. When faced with a simple request to back up his claims all he can do is bad-mouth others."
So you would change your mind about everything you criticize about me if I were to produce W2G's? Maybe you ought to re-read what Joe wrote then re-examine your haphazard response. [snipped]
So you would change your mind about everything you criticize about me if I were to produce W2G's? Maybe you ought to re-read what Joe wrote then re-examine your haphazard response. [snipped]
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:27 pm
Looks like theres something going on here I don't quite understand but I would be willing to be a student of each of you in order to prove which way is the best. I also just read where Bob Dancer says he hit 110 royal flushes in a six month period playing $5 VP which is hard to believe because I can go several weeks without even seeing anyone hit a Royal.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:27 pm
Let me clarify this, I am not questioning the fact on the amount of royal flushes anyone says they hit I am just saying they don't seem to be that plentifull where I play.