Loosest Vegas Video Poker
-
EDC1977
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 2001
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:12 pm
clwn2; I can honestly say 3 times in 13 years. Once at the GVR and twice at Sams Town. Never in Calif. or elsewhere.
-
shadowman
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
Clwn2, nice edit.
I took no offense. I assmed your "original" post was tongue-in-cheek just like my grumbles. I've had many, many dealt royals so I have nothing to complain about. However, if whining will help I can grumble some more.
I took no offense. I assmed your "original" post was tongue-in-cheek just like my grumbles. I've had many, many dealt royals so I have nothing to complain about. However, if whining will help I can grumble some more.
-
EDC1977
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 2001
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:12 pm
Hey Shadow, I recently read a reader poll about LV beverages and they complained that the whine in LV was weak!
-
duckhunter
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:06 pm
Shadowman, I have a question about the dealt royals. My wife and I play sometimes at the Gold Strike in Tunica, where their are some machines that to hit the Jackpot (each machine is its own progressive) you will have to be dealt the Royal, I been dealt 4 to the royal more time than I can count and maybe once in a while I would get one royal. I have Hit the jackpot once had a Royal dealt on the bottom. My question is have you noticed that the Royal was dealt more on one game than another. These are Triple play nickles, 10 nickles per line and I have seen the Jackpot close to $19,000 several times. There are several near $10,000. now. None of the games are games that a person looking for correct payout would play. MGM changed all the paytables.
-
shadowman
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
The odds of being dealt a RF is the same for all standard VP machines (52 card decks). Out of the 2,598,960 possible dealt hands you can get 4 royals. The divison tells you that you have a 1 chance in 649,740 of being dealt a royal.
Since I play around 900K hands per year (600K dealt hands) I expect to get one dealt royal every year. Last year I had 3 dealt to me (beat the odds) but none on a multi-play. I doubt I have 650K dealt hands at multi-play in my life so I'm not at all surprised (even though I grumble about it ).
Since I play around 900K hands per year (600K dealt hands) I expect to get one dealt royal every year. Last year I had 3 dealt to me (beat the odds) but none on a multi-play. I doubt I have 650K dealt hands at multi-play in my life so I'm not at all surprised (even though I grumble about it ).
-
jrhfilms
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:01 pm
FYI... I was at Morongo in Palm Springs. Decided my first play was going to be at a 5 play quarter DDB machine. Within the first ten minutes I was dealt a RF. The poor pay schedule didn't seem to make much difference that night. It's all about the luck... after your perfect play stategy.
-
clwn2
- Senior Member
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:35 am
Clwn2, nice edit.
I took no offense. I assmed your "original" post was tongue-in-cheek just like my grumbles. I've had many, many dealt royals so I have nothing to complain about. However, if whining will help I can grumble some more.
Just caught this one Shadow. I was embarrassed by my post and tried to delete it before anyone could see it. That was before I read the fine print that says you cannot delete your posts. I was worried that it would be taken the wrong way. I am glad that you were not offended.
As my wife would verify, I can appear abrasive from time to time, by accident of course. I know that my reasoning does not always parallel mathematical fact and I tend to muddy the waters a bit with my thinking.
I think what I do most on this forum is vent about the unfairness of the rng. If not that then I will usually be upset that my theories of the past were so far off the mark. Somehow I rebel a bit at the simple(or complex) nature of the mathamatics behind the games. No biggie because I always come around in the end!
I took no offense. I assmed your "original" post was tongue-in-cheek just like my grumbles. I've had many, many dealt royals so I have nothing to complain about. However, if whining will help I can grumble some more.
Just caught this one Shadow. I was embarrassed by my post and tried to delete it before anyone could see it. That was before I read the fine print that says you cannot delete your posts. I was worried that it would be taken the wrong way. I am glad that you were not offended.
As my wife would verify, I can appear abrasive from time to time, by accident of course. I know that my reasoning does not always parallel mathematical fact and I tend to muddy the waters a bit with my thinking.
I think what I do most on this forum is vent about the unfairness of the rng. If not that then I will usually be upset that my theories of the past were so far off the mark. Somehow I rebel a bit at the simple(or complex) nature of the mathamatics behind the games. No biggie because I always come around in the end!
Continue with Google