Gambling With an Edge May 26th

[New2vp]

You have an odd way about you New2vp. if you're not comfortable posting something about Frank with all the implications it looks like I shook you into displaying, either don't dither, or remain silent like other do. I consider my previous issue with him closed and i'm capable of moving on. You sir are trying to stir the pot when it was emptied days ago. You criticized Frank. Get over it and calm down please.That's all you got out of my last two posts?!?  Good luck using that keen logic and verbal analysis.  Go ahead, lengthen this thread on your own.  Presumably that's your primary purpose.  Don't let me stop you.  Further explanatory words from me clearly won't help your understanding.

[backsider]

The fact that you think too much into insignificant issues is your own worst enemy. I didn't go through your post point-by-point because it would be, well, pointless. You tried to stir a pot that didn't have anything in it. Glad to see you did realize that.

[shadowman]

Backsider, you are the one who appears dedicated to making issues where none exist. That is obvious. Your motivations appear to be an attack on those who follow the standard mathematical approach to VP. First you attack Frank, then you make a snarky response about me and now you are attacking new2vp. Maybe you should just say what you're thinking. 

[faygo]

I was and am still suspicious.

[backsider]

Backsider, you are the one who appears dedicated to making issues where none exist. That is obvious. Your motivations appear to be an attack on those who follow the standard mathematical approach to VP. First you attack Frank, then you make a snarky response about me and now you are attacking new2vp. Maybe you should just say what you're thinking. 
 You stopped reading at a crucial point, why i can't say. I settled with Frank and you're incorrect about the issue, it had nothing to do with any standard approach. I questioned how so many sets of deuces could be hit in 6 hands. I still don't believe him but i accepted his explanation and have moved on. New2vp doesn't appear to believe it either, but because he wet Frank's bed on those M casino machines it was an awkward situation for him and he realizes he never should had gotten involved. He then got testy with me and to no avail, i wasn't biting. I haven't found any snarky reply to you.  ? except maybe this one

[New2vp]

I was and am still suspicious.Upon reflection, suspicions confirmed.  More words will not stop his delusions.  It's not even much fun zinging him with direct hits since he rarely gets the point.Shadowman, I admit I'm stumped as to the optimal treatment plan.  I'm guessing that it's unlikely he will remember to take his medication and I think most therapists would quit before getting halfway through the needed sessions.Faygo, I admit to you I was expecting a caricature of a pot-stirrer but it's probably difficult to find one where the one stirring the pot is projecting his actions onto others.I'm now in anxious anticipation waiting for one of his "witty" I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I? responses replete with misspellings, malapropisms and grammatical gaffes.Let's see if I can make this transparent even to him using short sentences.  THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FRANK.  I LIKE HIS POSTS.  HE HAS SOMETHING WORTHWHILE TO SAY.  HIS RESPONSES ARE CLEVER.  HE IS ARTICULATE.  HE APPEARS TO BE A NICE PERSON.I DON'T CARE MUCH FOR THE OTHER GUY.  HE'S PRETTY MUCH THE ANTI-FRANK.Do you think that is free enough of subtlety so he can figure it out?  <Sigh> I know...probably not!