On Paytables.....

[rapidbison]

See previous thread.

[rapidbison]

"Thoughts for beginners".....and old veteran players....For all we know, we have been playing 95% games for years.....Get over it and play for fun...you either win or you lose....stop trying to be professional gamblers.......playing vp--unless where properly designated paybacks are promptly displayed....

[rapidbison]

Is Dancer's multi-million dollar training software generated by a "95% Confident" RNG chip..and if so has he ever disclosed that to the public???If not, then has his software ever been updated to be recalculated for today's "95% Confident" RNG casinos???? Maybe class-action refunds are in order................

[Vman96]

Is Dancer's multi-million dollar training software generated by a "95% Confident" RNG chip..and if so has he ever disclosed that to the public???If not, then has his software ever been updated to be recalculated for today's "95% Confident" RNG casinos???? Maybe class-action refunds are in order................

RNGs in the 21st century are much more than 95% confident in practice. But I agree Nevada should update that to a higher standard, at least 99%, but preferably 99.99% or higher. But you can't demand 100% certainty because that would actually require infinite testing time. I would expect the RNG in Video Poker for winners to be well over 99% in randomness confidence.

[rapidbison]

And the point is...how does or would he adjust play for up to 5% randomness deficiency if the so-called ironclad paytables/strategies have been based on a more clean/closer to true randomness testing????You change play based on one coin difference in say...fh or flush...wouldn't 5% difference in randomness consistency be more significant???Huge in fact????Food for thought...and explanation by Dancer should anyone attend a seminar and/or own the training software to contact about....I'm still gonna play for fun regardless, I used to hammer away as a true dancerhead in the past until I admitted to myself--this is only beatable in the moment if you win and cash out..I still read too many posts of people trying to emulate with strict optimal play/math endlessly.....